
Radeon 660M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 660M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Radeon 660M
2023Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 660M better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 660M and Radeon R9 M290X

Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M
The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 660M scores 3,221 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 660M) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,221 | 3,218 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 1900 MHz+111% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 660M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 660M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 660M draws 40W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 660M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 80.5+150% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 660M | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | Neptune |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #565 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












