
Quadro M1200
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Quadro M1200
2017Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M290X better than Quadro M1200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro M1200 make more sense than Radeon R9 M290X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M290X

Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212 | 3,218 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+28% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-55% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+122% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. The Quadro M1200 costs 100+% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.0 |
| Codename | GM107 | Neptune |
| Release | January 11 2017 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #567 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












