Quadro M1200 vs Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M290X

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 M290X better than Quadro M1200?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,212 vs 3,218 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 M290X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M1200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2014 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 M290X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $400 MSRP. Radeon R9 M290X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 M290X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $400 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M1200 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 100W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro M1200 make more sense than Radeon R9 M290X?
Yes. Quadro M1200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 M290X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 M290X currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
1080p
low34 FPS78 FPS
medium21 FPS67 FPS
high13 FPS53 FPS
ultra6 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS69 FPS
medium9 FPS59 FPS
high4 FPS42 FPS
ultra2 FPS27 FPS
4K
low5 FPS24 FPS
medium3 FPS23 FPS
high2 FPS15 FPS
ultra1 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
1080p
low79 FPS112 FPS
medium49 FPS84 FPS
high37 FPS64 FPS
ultra22 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS64 FPS
medium27 FPS43 FPS
high17 FPS32 FPS
ultra12 FPS22 FPS
4K
low12 FPS24 FPS
medium9 FPS16 FPS
high8 FPS13 FPS
ultra5 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
1080p
low145 FPS145 FPS
medium116 FPS116 FPS
high96 FPS97 FPS
ultra72 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS109 FPS
medium87 FPS87 FPS
high72 FPS72 FPS
ultra54 FPS54 FPS
4K
low72 FPS72 FPS
medium58 FPS58 FPS
high48 FPS48 FPS
ultra36 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
1080p
low145 FPS142 FPS
medium116 FPS113 FPS
high96 FPS97 FPS
ultra72 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS103 FPS
medium87 FPS84 FPS
high72 FPS72 FPS
ultra54 FPS54 FPS
4K
low71 FPS60 FPS
medium56 FPS46 FPS
high46 FPS36 FPS
ultra35 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
G3D Mark Score
3,212
3,218
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.399 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+65%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+28%
900 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
TDP
45W-55%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
71.4+122%
32.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. The Quadro M1200 costs 100+% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP
$0-100%
$400
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.0
Codename
GM107
Neptune
Release
January 11 2017
January 9 2014
Ranking
#567
#566