Quadro K5100M vs Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M290X

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K5100M better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,264 vs 3,218 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K5100M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5100M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro K5100M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro K5100M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and you are getting 1.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M290X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 M290X make more sense than Quadro K5100M?
Yes. Radeon R9 M290X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $400 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K5100M. The trade-off is that Quadro K5100M currently gives you 1.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M290X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low103 FPS78 FPS
medium87 FPS67 FPS
high72 FPS53 FPS
ultra47 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS69 FPS
medium75 FPS59 FPS
high55 FPS42 FPS
ultra36 FPS27 FPS
4K
low36 FPS24 FPS
medium33 FPS23 FPS
high20 FPS15 FPS
ultra17 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low81 FPS112 FPS
medium60 FPS84 FPS
high46 FPS64 FPS
ultra30 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low46 FPS64 FPS
medium31 FPS43 FPS
high23 FPS32 FPS
ultra16 FPS22 FPS
4K
low18 FPS24 FPS
medium12 FPS16 FPS
high10 FPS13 FPS
ultra7 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low147 FPS145 FPS
medium118 FPS116 FPS
high98 FPS97 FPS
ultra73 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS109 FPS
medium88 FPS87 FPS
high73 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
4K
low73 FPS72 FPS
medium59 FPS58 FPS
high49 FPS48 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low147 FPS142 FPS
medium118 FPS113 FPS
high98 FPS97 FPS
ultra73 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS103 FPS
medium88 FPS84 FPS
high73 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
4K
low73 FPS60 FPS
medium59 FPS46 FPS
high49 FPS36 FPS
ultra37 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5100M scores 3,264 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5100M) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X).

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
G3D Mark Score
3,264+1%
3,218
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+20%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+3%
2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5100M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The Quadro K5100M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5100M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5100M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
TDP
100W
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.6+1%
32.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M290X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon R9 M290X
MSRP
$400
Codename
GK104
Neptune
Release
July 23 2013
January 9 2014
Ranking
#562
#566