GRID P100-8Q vs Radeon R9 M290X

GRID P100-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1743.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,374 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($7,374 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Radeon R9 M290X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,974 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1715.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $7,374 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P100-8Q better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,267 vs 3,218 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P100-8Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P100-8Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P100-8Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P100-8Q is about 1743.5% more expensive on MSRP at $7,374 MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M290X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 M290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M290X is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,218 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low30 FPS78 FPS
medium17 FPS67 FPS
high11 FPS53 FPS
ultra5 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS69 FPS
medium7 FPS59 FPS
high4 FPS42 FPS
ultra2 FPS27 FPS
4K
low5 FPS24 FPS
medium3 FPS23 FPS
high2 FPS15 FPS
ultra1 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low82 FPS112 FPS
medium51 FPS84 FPS
high38 FPS64 FPS
ultra24 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS64 FPS
medium25 FPS43 FPS
high16 FPS32 FPS
ultra12 FPS22 FPS
4K
low11 FPS24 FPS
medium9 FPS16 FPS
high7 FPS13 FPS
ultra5 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low147 FPS145 FPS
medium118 FPS116 FPS
high98 FPS97 FPS
ultra74 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS109 FPS
medium88 FPS87 FPS
high74 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
4K
low74 FPS72 FPS
medium59 FPS58 FPS
high49 FPS48 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
1080p
low147 FPS142 FPS
medium118 FPS113 FPS
high98 FPS97 FPS
ultra74 FPS72 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS103 FPS
medium88 FPS84 FPS
high74 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
4K
low72 FPS60 FPS
medium57 FPS46 FPS
high46 FPS36 FPS
ultra36 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P100-8Q and Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

GRID P100-8Q

The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P100-8Q scores 3,267 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
G3D Mark Score
3,267+2%
3,218
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+45%
900 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P100-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P100-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GRID P100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P100-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P100-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Perf/Watt
14.5
32.2+122%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P100-8Q launched at $7374 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. The Radeon R9 M290X costs 94.6% less ($6974 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID P100-8Q) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X offers 1900% better value. The GRID P100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID P100-8QRadeon R9 M290X
MSRP
$7374
$400-95%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
8.0+1900%
Codename
GM107
Neptune
Release
May 18 2016
January 9 2014
Ranking
#622
#566