
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+531.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 532.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,218 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 M290X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+531.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 532.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,218 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 M290X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M290X
Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 3,218 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 531.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+531% | 3,218 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+603% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+85% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1448% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+216% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.0 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 536.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 M290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+536% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Neptune |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #566 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












