G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅32.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 195mm instead of 201mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
51.3% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quadro P2200

2019

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Why buy it

✅32.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 195mm instead of 201mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
51.3% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P2200 better than Radeon R9 Fury X?

Yes. Quadro P2200 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 0% higher PassMark G3D performance and 5 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2015, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, more VRAM at 5 GB instead of 4 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P2200 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro P2200 is about $220 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 Fury X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 Fury X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $649 MSRP, even if Quadro P2200 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	81 FPS	92 FPS
medium	69 FPS	80 FPS
high	56 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	76 FPS
medium	61 FPS	66 FPS
high	44 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	30 FPS
medium	24 FPS	27 FPS
high	16 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	18 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	156 FPS	243 FPS
medium	120 FPS	205 FPS
high	89 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	176 FPS
medium	80 FPS	145 FPS
high	61 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	98 FPS
medium	42 FPS	80 FPS
high	33 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	333 FPS	422 FPS
medium	295 FPS	338 FPS
high	220 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	184 FPS	211 FPS
1440p
low	249 FPS	317 FPS
medium	225 FPS	253 FPS
high	175 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	163 FPS	211 FPS
medium	141 FPS	169 FPS
high	92 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	106 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
1080p
low	147 FPS	160 FPS
medium	120 FPS	133 FPS
high	103 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	105 FPS	116 FPS
medium	86 FPS	98 FPS
high	74 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	71 FPS
medium	48 FPS	58 FPS
high	38 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	36 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon R9 Fury X

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score	9,386	9,382
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+125%
Boost Clock	1493 MHz+42%	1050 MHz
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	1 MB+113%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Bus Width	256-bit	4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury X
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	201mm	195mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	60°C-20%
Perf/Watt	125.1+267%	34.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. The Quadro P2200 costs 33.9% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.9 (Quadro P2200) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Quadro P2200 offers 51% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).