
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅64.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile better than Radeon R9 Fury X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury X

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.

Radeon R9 Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile scores 9,494 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,494+1% | 9,382 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+43% | 1050 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 4096-bit+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 128.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-78% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 158.2+364% | 34.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Codename | GN20-P0 | Fiji |
| Release | May 11 2021 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #286 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













