
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
2023Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 Fury X better than Arc 7-Cores iGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc 7-Cores iGPU make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 7-Cores iGPU and Radeon R9 Fury X

Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,349 points.

Radeon R9 Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU scores 9,349 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,349 | 9,382 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 4096+58414% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+110% | 1050 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 Fury X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 4096-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 60°C-29% |
| Perf/Watt | 623.3+1728% | 34.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU costs 100+% less ($649 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Arc 7-Cores iGPU offers Infinity% better value. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 14.5 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Fiji |
| Release | December 14 2023 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #377 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













