G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon R9 Fury

2015

Why buy it

✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 195mm instead of 201mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
28% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quadro P2200

2019

Radeon R9 Fury

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 Fury: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 Fury is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Why buy it

✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 195mm instead of 201mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
28% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 Fury better than Quadro P2200?

Yes. Radeon R9 Fury is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.4% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2015 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, more VRAM at 5 GB instead of 4 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 Fury is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon R9 Fury is about 28.0% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 27.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.4% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P2200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Quadro P2200 make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury?

Yes. Quadro P2200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 275W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $429 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 Fury. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 Fury currently gives you 1.4% higher G3D Mark and 27.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Quadro P2200 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Fury Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low	81 FPS	92 FPS
medium	69 FPS	80 FPS
high	56 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	76 FPS
medium	61 FPS	66 FPS
high	44 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	30 FPS
medium	24 FPS	27 FPS
high	16 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	17 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low	156 FPS	243 FPS
medium	120 FPS	205 FPS
high	89 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	176 FPS
medium	80 FPS	145 FPS
high	61 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	98 FPS
medium	42 FPS	80 FPS
high	33 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low	333 FPS	428 FPS
medium	295 FPS	343 FPS
high	220 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	184 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	249 FPS	321 FPS
medium	225 FPS	257 FPS
high	175 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	163 FPS	214 FPS
medium	141 FPS	171 FPS
high	92 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	107 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low	147 FPS	160 FPS
medium	120 FPS	133 FPS
high	103 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	105 FPS	116 FPS
medium	86 FPS	98 FPS
high	74 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	71 FPS
medium	48 FPS	58 FPS
high	38 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	36 FPS

Open Quadro P2200 Open Radeon R9 Fury

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon R9 Fury

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon R9 Fury

The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
G3D Mark Score	9,386	9,521+1%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	3584+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.822 TFLOPS	7.168 TFLOPS+88%
Boost Clock	1493 MHz+49%	1000 MHz
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	80	224+180%
L1 Cache	480 KB	896 KB+87%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury has 4 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
VRAM Capacity	5 GB+25%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Bus Width	256-bit	4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB	2 MB+60%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	Quadro P2200	Radeon R9 Fury
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-17%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	201mm	195mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	125.1+262%	34.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The Quadro P2200 costs 21.9% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.9 (Quadro P2200) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Quadro P2200 offers 26.6% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).