
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 275W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.6% longer card at 241mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 241mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ❌111.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 130W.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 275W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 241mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.6% longer card at 241mm vs 195mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ❌111.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 Fury better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A60 make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and Radeon R9 Fury

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+17% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+105% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 4096-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 71.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-53% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0+111% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The Intel Arc Pro A60 costs 30.8% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 44.5% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-31% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+45% | 17.3 |
| Codename | DG2-256 | Fiji |
| Release | June 6 2023 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #275 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













