Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon R9 Fury

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023Core: 900 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $169 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 130W instead of 275W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 23.6% longer card at 241mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 195mm instead of 241mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 44.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
  • 111.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 Fury better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Yes. Radeon R9 Fury is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 9,521 vs 9,493 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon R9 Fury is a 2015 card with FSR upscaling, while Intel Arc Pro A60 is a 2023 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro A60 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 Fury is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon R9 Fury is about 44.5% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Intel Arc Pro A60 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Intel Arc Pro A60 make more sense than Radeon R9 Fury?
Yes. Intel Arc Pro A60 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 275W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $380 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 Fury. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 Fury currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Intel Arc Pro A60 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low101 FPS92 FPS
medium89 FPS80 FPS
high75 FPS65 FPS
ultra52 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS76 FPS
medium73 FPS66 FPS
high57 FPS49 FPS
ultra39 FPS33 FPS
4K
low35 FPS30 FPS
medium32 FPS27 FPS
high24 FPS20 FPS
ultra22 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low188 FPS243 FPS
medium148 FPS205 FPS
high103 FPS162 FPS
ultra77 FPS133 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS176 FPS
medium97 FPS145 FPS
high72 FPS121 FPS
ultra53 FPS94 FPS
4K
low69 FPS98 FPS
medium54 FPS80 FPS
high43 FPS65 FPS
ultra31 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low427 FPS428 FPS
medium342 FPS343 FPS
high285 FPS286 FPS
ultra214 FPS214 FPS
1440p
low320 FPS321 FPS
medium256 FPS257 FPS
high214 FPS214 FPS
ultra160 FPS161 FPS
4K
low214 FPS214 FPS
medium171 FPS171 FPS
high142 FPS143 FPS
ultra107 FPS107 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low155 FPS160 FPS
medium124 FPS133 FPS
high106 FPS115 FPS
ultra87 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS116 FPS
medium93 FPS98 FPS
high80 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS73 FPS
4K
low68 FPS71 FPS
medium55 FPS58 FPS
high44 FPS46 FPS
ultra33 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and Radeon R9 Fury

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury

The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
G3D Mark Score
9,493
9,521
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
3584+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS+17%
7.168 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+105%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
224+75%
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
System
512 GB/s
Bus Width
System
4096-bit
L2 Cache
12 MB+500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
Encoder
Intel Xe Media Engine
VCE 3.0
Decoder
Intel Xe Media Engine
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 71.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
TDP
130W-53%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
241mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
73.0+111%
34.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The Intel Arc Pro A60 costs 30.8% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 44.5% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro A60Radeon R9 Fury
MSRP
$380-31%
$549
Performance per Dollar
25.0+45%
17.3
Codename
DG2-256
Fiji
Release
June 6 2023
July 10 2015
Ranking
#275
#274