
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 275W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌323.1% higher power demand at 275W vs 65W.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
2020Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 275W, a 210W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌323.1% higher power demand at 275W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design and Radeon R9 Fury

GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,674 points.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design scores 9,674 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 4.55 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,674+2% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.55 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz+19% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+116% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 93.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 512 GB/s+94% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design draws 65W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 123.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-76% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 195mm |
| Height | — | 115mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+330% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $549 |
| Codename | TU106 | Fiji |
| Release | January 29 2020 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #268 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













