
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 275W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 195mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌52.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 275W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 195mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌120.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌52.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 Fury

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 9,521 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 5.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+6% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+24% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 4096-bit+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 41.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-35% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+62% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 54.6% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 133.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-55% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+134% | 17.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Fiji |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













