
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 390X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 390X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
2023Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 390X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 390X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc 7-Cores iGPU better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc 7-Cores iGPU and Radeon R9 390X

Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,349 points.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU scores 9,349 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,349 | 9,278 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7 | 2816+40129% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+110% | 1050 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 390X has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 390X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 512-bit.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 512-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 277mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 277mm |
| Height | 0mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 623.3+1750% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU costs 100+% less ($429 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Arc 7-Cores iGPU) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the Arc 7-Cores iGPU offers Infinity% better value. The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc 7-Cores iGPU | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 21.6 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Grenada |
| Release | December 14 2023 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #377 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













