
GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌20.8% longer card at 267mm vs 221mm.
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 770: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 770 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 770
2013Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 770: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 770 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380X across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌74.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌20.8% longer card at 267mm vs 221mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380X better than GeForce GTX 770?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 770 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 380X

GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961 | 6,131+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+12% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 770) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 111.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+111% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 8.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-8% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9+6% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. The Radeon R9 380X costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 79.9% better value. The Radeon R9 380X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 26.8+80% |
| Codename | GK104 | Antigua |
| Release | May 30 2013 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #398 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













