GRID P40-4Q vs Radeon R9 380

GRID P40-4Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 380

2015Boost: 970 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1407.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1426.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-4Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 380 better than GRID P40-4Q?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,926 vs 6,000 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 380 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 380 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013 and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 380 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $199 MSRP. Radeon R9 380 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 380 is about $2,801 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $3,000 MSRP, and you are getting 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $199 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and FSR upscaling.
Is GRID P40-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GRID P40-4Q is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $3,000 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon R9 380 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
1080p
low103 FPS78 FPS
medium89 FPS67 FPS
high70 FPS54 FPS
ultra42 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS69 FPS
medium79 FPS60 FPS
high56 FPS43 FPS
ultra32 FPS27 FPS
4K
low29 FPS25 FPS
medium27 FPS24 FPS
high18 FPS15 FPS
ultra16 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
1080p
low111 FPS128 FPS
medium78 FPS98 FPS
high57 FPS78 FPS
ultra39 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low72 FPS72 FPS
medium49 FPS52 FPS
high37 FPS38 FPS
ultra27 FPS27 FPS
4K
low36 FPS27 FPS
medium25 FPS19 FPS
high20 FPS15 FPS
ultra14 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
1080p
low267 FPS270 FPS
medium213 FPS216 FPS
high178 FPS180 FPS
ultra133 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low200 FPS202 FPS
medium160 FPS162 FPS
high133 FPS135 FPS
ultra100 FPS101 FPS
4K
low133 FPS135 FPS
medium107 FPS108 FPS
high89 FPS90 FPS
ultra67 FPS68 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
1080p
low166 FPS139 FPS
medium133 FPS115 FPS
high117 FPS100 FPS
ultra90 FPS85 FPS
1440p
low121 FPS103 FPS
medium99 FPS85 FPS
high87 FPS74 FPS
ultra62 FPS59 FPS
4K
low70 FPS61 FPS
medium54 FPS48 FPS
high44 FPS38 FPS
ultra29 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and Radeon R9 380

NVIDIA

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380).

FeatureGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
G3D Mark Score
5,926
6,000+1%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS
3.476 TFLOPS+52%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
128 KB
448 KB+250%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
TDP
225W
220W-2%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
26.3
27.3+4%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 93.4% less ($2801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 1410% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P40-4QRadeon R9 380
MSRP
$3000
$199-93%
Performance per Dollar
2.0
30.2+1410%
Codename
GK104
Antigua
Release
June 28 2013
June 18 2015
Ranking
#628
#396