
GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1407.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1426.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-4Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1426.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-4Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1407.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 380 better than GRID P40-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and Radeon R9 380

GRID P40-4Q
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926 | 6,000+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 3.476 TFLOPS+52% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 448 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 27.3+4% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 93.4% less ($2801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 1410% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $199-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 30.2+1410% |
| Codename | GK104 | Antigua |
| Release | June 28 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #628 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













