
GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID RTX6000-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
- ❌20.8% longer card at 267mm vs 221mm.
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID RTX6000-8Q
2015Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
- ❌20.8% longer card at 267mm vs 221mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 370 better than GRID RTX6000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID RTX6000-8Q make more sense than Radeon R9 370?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and Radeon R9 370

GRID RTX6000-8Q
GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,514 | 4,722+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+93% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+21% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GRID RTX6000-8Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 110W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1 | 42.9+113% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The GRID RTX6000-8Q costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 31.7 |
| Codename | GM204 | Trinidad |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #505 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













