
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌446.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 422.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 422.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌446.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Z better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon R9 290X

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811+5% | 8,426 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+105% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.632 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 947 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+36% | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 704 KB+193% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 950.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+5% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2 | 512-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon R9 290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 350W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W-7% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 24.1+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290X costs 81.7% less ($2450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 427.6% better value. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $549-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 15.3+428% |
| Codename | GK110B | Hawaii |
| Release | May 28 2014 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #300 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













