GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014Core: 705 MHzBoost: 876 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

2013Boost: 947 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 446.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290X

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 422.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Z better than Radeon R9 290X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 8,811 vs 8,426 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX TITAN Z is about 446.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and you are getting 4.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 290X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 290X is 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 8,426 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low118 FPS103 FPS
medium101 FPS89 FPS
high86 FPS72 FPS
ultra58 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS90 FPS
medium81 FPS79 FPS
high62 FPS57 FPS
ultra42 FPS33 FPS
4K
low38 FPS28 FPS
medium34 FPS27 FPS
high21 FPS18 FPS
ultra18 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low129 FPS197 FPS
medium107 FPS168 FPS
high89 FPS134 FPS
ultra66 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS134 FPS
medium66 FPS104 FPS
high52 FPS82 FPS
ultra38 FPS62 FPS
4K
low41 FPS61 FPS
medium33 FPS49 FPS
high30 FPS44 FPS
ultra24 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low396 FPS379 FPS
medium317 FPS303 FPS
high264 FPS253 FPS
ultra198 FPS190 FPS
1440p
low297 FPS284 FPS
medium238 FPS228 FPS
high198 FPS190 FPS
ultra149 FPS142 FPS
4K
low198 FPS190 FPS
medium159 FPS152 FPS
high132 FPS126 FPS
ultra99 FPS95 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low271 FPS155 FPS
medium232 FPS128 FPS
high193 FPS110 FPS
ultra150 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low200 FPS110 FPS
medium174 FPS91 FPS
high139 FPS79 FPS
ultra103 FPS65 FPS
4K
low112 FPS66 FPS
medium89 FPS52 FPS
high73 FPS41 FPS
ultra53 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 947 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
G3D Mark Score
8,811+5%
8,426
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
5760 ×2+105%
2816
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.046 TFLOPS ×2
5.632 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock
876 MHz
947 MHz+8%
ROPs
48 ×2
64+33%
TMUs
240 ×2+36%
176
L1 Cache
240 KB
704 KB+193%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 950.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s x2+5%
320 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit x2
512-bit+33%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.0
1.1+10%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 6.9% difference. The Radeon R9 290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
TDP
375W
350W-7%
Recommended PSU
700W-7%
750W
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
3
2-33%
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95°C
Perf/Watt
23.5
24.1+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290X costs 81.7% less ($2450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 427.6% better value. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN ZRadeon R9 290X
MSRP
$2999
$549-82%
Performance per Dollar
2.9
15.3+428%
Codename
GK110B
Hawaii
Release
May 28 2014
October 24 2013
Ranking
#300
#342