GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX Titan

2013Core: 837 MHzBoost: 876 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

2013Boost: 947 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX Titan

2013

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 82% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290X

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 87.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 290X better than GeForce GTX Titan?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 8,181 vs 8,426 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 290X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX Titan is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon R9 290X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $549 MSRP. Radeon R9 290X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 290X is about $450 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX Titan is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (250W vs 350W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX Titan make more sense than Radeon R9 290X?
Yes. GeForce GTX Titan is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (250W vs 350W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 290X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 290X currently gives you 3.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 87.4%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low86 FPS103 FPS
medium75 FPS89 FPS
high61 FPS72 FPS
ultra41 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low72 FPS90 FPS
medium64 FPS79 FPS
high46 FPS57 FPS
ultra31 FPS33 FPS
4K
low27 FPS28 FPS
medium25 FPS27 FPS
high17 FPS18 FPS
ultra14 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low172 FPS197 FPS
medium150 FPS168 FPS
high118 FPS134 FPS
ultra86 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low115 FPS134 FPS
medium89 FPS104 FPS
high67 FPS82 FPS
ultra47 FPS62 FPS
4K
low49 FPS61 FPS
medium40 FPS49 FPS
high36 FPS44 FPS
ultra27 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low368 FPS379 FPS
medium295 FPS303 FPS
high245 FPS253 FPS
ultra184 FPS190 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS284 FPS
medium221 FPS228 FPS
high184 FPS190 FPS
ultra138 FPS142 FPS
4K
low184 FPS190 FPS
medium147 FPS152 FPS
high123 FPS126 FPS
ultra92 FPS95 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
1080p
low217 FPS155 FPS
medium181 FPS128 FPS
high145 FPS110 FPS
ultra120 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low166 FPS110 FPS
medium142 FPS91 FPS
high110 FPS79 FPS
ultra87 FPS65 FPS
4K
low94 FPS66 FPS
medium73 FPS52 FPS
high58 FPS41 FPS
ultra44 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX Titan

The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 947 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
G3D Mark Score
8,181
8,426+3%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2688
2816+5%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.709 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS+20%
Boost Clock
876 MHz
947 MHz+8%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
224+27%
176
L1 Cache
224 KB
704 KB+214%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX Titan gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX Titan offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX Titan has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
320 GB/s+11%
Bus Width
384-bit
512-bit+33%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.0
1.1+10%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX Titan is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
TDP
250W-29%
350W
Recommended PSU
600W-20%
750W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95°C
Perf/Watt
32.7+36%
24.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290X costs 45% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 86.6% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX TitanRadeon R9 290X
MSRP
$999
$549-45%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
15.3+87%
Codename
GK110
Hawaii
Release
February 19 2013
October 24 2013
Ranking
#311
#342