
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 350W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 275mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌89.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 185W.
- ❌20.1% longer card at 275mm vs 229mm.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 350W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 275mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌89.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 185W.
- ❌20.1% longer card at 275mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 40HX better than Radeon R9 290X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon R9 290X

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+4% | 8,426 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+35% | 5.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+74% | 947 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 176+22% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+233% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: No vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 61.7% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-47% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-16% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3+96% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The Radeon R9 290X costs 21.5% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 22.4% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $549-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 15.3+22% |
| Codename | TU106 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 25 2021 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #302 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













