
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 156.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 156.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon R9 280

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon R9 280's 5,532 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 267.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+267% | 5,532 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+384% | 3.344 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+78% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+991% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 280 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 86.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+87% | 240 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+267% | 27.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 30.1% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 157.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $279-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+157% | 19.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Tahiti |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #73 | #415 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












