GRID P40-12Q vs Radeon R9 280

GRID P40-12Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 280

2014Boost: 933 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P40-12Q

2015

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1942.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Radeon R9 280

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,420 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1939.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P40-12Q better than Radeon R9 280?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,540 vs 5,532 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P40-12Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P40-12Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 3 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P40-12Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P40-12Q is about 1942.7% more expensive on MSRP at $5,699 MSRP versus $279 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 280 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 280 is 2014 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM, 5,532 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
1080p
low104 FPS77 FPS
medium90 FPS63 FPS
high73 FPS50 FPS
ultra44 FPS33 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS65 FPS
medium80 FPS54 FPS
high58 FPS38 FPS
ultra33 FPS24 FPS
4K
low29 FPS24 FPS
medium27 FPS23 FPS
high18 FPS14 FPS
ultra16 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
1080p
low162 FPS129 FPS
medium128 FPS100 FPS
high94 FPS79 FPS
ultra75 FPS53 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS73 FPS
medium92 FPS53 FPS
high74 FPS39 FPS
ultra57 FPS28 FPS
4K
low68 FPS28 FPS
medium52 FPS20 FPS
high43 FPS16 FPS
ultra32 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
1080p
low249 FPS249 FPS
medium199 FPS199 FPS
high166 FPS166 FPS
ultra125 FPS124 FPS
1440p
low187 FPS187 FPS
medium150 FPS149 FPS
high125 FPS124 FPS
ultra93 FPS93 FPS
4K
low125 FPS124 FPS
medium100 FPS100 FPS
high83 FPS83 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
1080p
low182 FPS140 FPS
medium148 FPS116 FPS
high133 FPS100 FPS
ultra103 FPS85 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS103 FPS
medium110 FPS85 FPS
high99 FPS74 FPS
ultra77 FPS59 FPS
4K
low77 FPS62 FPS
medium60 FPS48 FPS
high49 FPS38 FPS
ultra36 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-12Q and Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA

GRID P40-12Q

The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 280

The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-12Q scores 5,540 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-12Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 933 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
G3D Mark Score
5,540
5,532
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+14%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+44%
3.344 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+26%
933 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
768 KB+71%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-12Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GRID P40-12Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-12Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-12Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
TDP
225W
200W-11%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Perf/Watt
24.6
27.7+13%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 95.1% less ($5420 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 1880% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID P40-12QRadeon R9 280
MSRP
$5699
$279-95%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
19.8+1880%
Codename
GM204
Tahiti
Release
August 30 2015
March 4 2014
Ranking
#433
#415