
GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1942.7% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,420 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1939.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID P40-12Q
2015Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,420 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1939.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1942.7% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-12Q better than Radeon R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-12Q and Radeon R9 280

GRID P40-12Q
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-12Q scores 5,540 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-12Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,540 | 5,532 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+44% | 3.344 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+26% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+71% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-12Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GRID P40-12Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-12Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-12Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 24.6 | 27.7+13% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 95.1% less ($5420 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 1880% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $279-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 19.8+1880% |
| Codename | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #433 | #415 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












