
M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is M1 8-Core GPU better than Radeon R9 270X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 270X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 270X
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The M1 8-Core GPU scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8 (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+3% | 4,874 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1280+15900% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The M1 8-Core GPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) β a 163.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Bus width: Unified vs 256-bit.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+164% |
| Bus Width | Unified | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: N/A (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). OpenGL: 4.1 (Rosetta 2) vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | N/A | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: Apple M1 Video Decoder vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Apple M1 Video Encoder | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Apple M1 Video Decoder | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The M1 8-Core GPU draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W β a 142.9% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-83% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | β | 241mm |
| Height | β | 109mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+515% | 27.1 |
Value Analysis
The M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 24.5 |
| Codename | β | Curacao |
| Release | November 10 2020 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #428 | #448 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













