G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270X

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019

Radeon R9 270X

2013

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 270X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 270X better than GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,800 vs 4,874 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 270X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 270X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $199 MSRP. Radeon R9 270X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 270X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $199 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the newer 2019 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 180W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB make more sense than Radeon R9 270X?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 270X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 270X currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 270X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
1080p
low	43 FPS	78 FPS
medium	28 FPS	66 FPS
high	21 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	30 FPS	69 FPS
medium	19 FPS	59 FPS
high	11 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	15 FPS	24 FPS
medium	10 FPS	23 FPS
high	6 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Open Radeon R9 270X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
1080p
low	81 FPS	116 FPS
medium	50 FPS	86 FPS
high	37 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	41 FPS
1440p
low	34 FPS	65 FPS
medium	24 FPS	44 FPS
high	15 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	10 FPS	24 FPS
medium	7 FPS	16 FPS
high	6 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Open Radeon R9 270X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
1080p
low	216 FPS	219 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	144 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	164 FPS
medium	130 FPS	132 FPS
high	108 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	110 FPS
medium	86 FPS	88 FPS
high	72 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Open Radeon R9 270X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
1080p
low	216 FPS	137 FPS
medium	173 FPS	112 FPS
high	144 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	82 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	100 FPS
medium	130 FPS	83 FPS
high	108 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	59 FPS
medium	78 FPS	46 FPS
high	68 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Open Radeon R9 270X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon R9 270X

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
G3D Mark Score	4,800	4,874+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	1280+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.215 TFLOPS	2.688 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	1442 MHz+37%	1050 MHz
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	80+67%
L1 Cache	288 KB	320 KB+11%
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 270X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) — a 113.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	84 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+113%
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80 C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon R9 270X
TDP	75W-58%	180W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	109mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80 C
Perf/Watt	64.0+136%	27.1