
Radeon HD 7870 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7870 XT
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$270 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($270 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7870 XT
2012Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$270 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($270 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7870 XT better than Radeon R9 270?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 270 make more sense than Radeon HD 7870 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7870 XT and Radeon R9 270

Radeon HD 7870 XT
Radeon HD 7870 XT
The Radeon HD 7870 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,470 points. Launch price was $270.

Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7870 XT scores 4,470 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7870 XT is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 7870 XT) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870 XT) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,470+4% | 4,306 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.995 TFLOPS+26% | 2.368 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz+5% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (Radeon HD 7870 XT) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 7.1% advantage for the Radeon HD 7870 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+7% | 179.2 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7870 XT draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon R9 270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7870 XT) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.2 | 28.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7870 XT launched at $270 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. The Radeon R9 270 costs 33.7% less ($91 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Radeon HD 7870 XT) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 45.2% better value. The Radeon R9 270 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7870 XT | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270 | $179-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6 | 24.1+45% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Curacao |
| Release | November 19 2012 | November 13 2013 |
| Ranking | #469 | #476 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













