GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270

2013Boost: 925 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) better than Radeon R9 270?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,463 vs 4,306 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon R9 270 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 3nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $179 MSRP, and you are getting 3.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 270 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 270 is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 4,306 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
1080p
low78 FPS77 FPS
medium68 FPS62 FPS
high54 FPS49 FPS
ultra35 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low71 FPS65 FPS
medium61 FPS53 FPS
high43 FPS37 FPS
ultra28 FPS23 FPS
4K
low26 FPS23 FPS
medium24 FPS22 FPS
high16 FPS14 FPS
ultra14 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
1080p
low87 FPS116 FPS
medium60 FPS86 FPS
high44 FPS66 FPS
ultra28 FPS41 FPS
1440p
low49 FPS65 FPS
medium29 FPS44 FPS
high21 FPS32 FPS
ultra14 FPS21 FPS
4K
low17 FPS23 FPS
medium11 FPS16 FPS
high9 FPS13 FPS
ultra6 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
1080p
low201 FPS194 FPS
medium161 FPS155 FPS
high134 FPS129 FPS
ultra100 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS145 FPS
medium121 FPS116 FPS
high100 FPS97 FPS
ultra75 FPS73 FPS
4K
low100 FPS97 FPS
medium80 FPS78 FPS
high67 FPS65 FPS
ultra50 FPS48 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
1080p
low159 FPS136 FPS
medium131 FPS111 FPS
high116 FPS96 FPS
ultra93 FPS82 FPS
1440p
low116 FPS100 FPS
medium96 FPS82 FPS
high86 FPS71 FPS
ultra68 FPS56 FPS
4K
low66 FPS59 FPS
medium54 FPS46 FPS
high44 FPS36 FPS
ultra33 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score
4,463+4%
4,306
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3584+180%
1280

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 270 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R9 270. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+60%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
89.3+211%
28.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)Radeon R9 270
MSRP
$179
Codename
GN22-X2
Curacao
Release
January 2 2025
November 13 2013
Ranking
#não classificado
#476