
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 250X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
2019Why buy it
- ✅36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 250X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 250X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌101% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon R7 250X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌25% longer card at 210mm vs 168mm.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
2019Radeon R7 250X
2014Why buy it
- ✅36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 250X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 250X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌101% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌25% longer card at 210mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 3200 better than Radeon R7 250X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 250X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 250X

Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R7 250X
Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 2,269+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS+14% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-19% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 210mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 70°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+20% | 28.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. The Radeon R7 250X costs 50.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 106.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $99-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 22.9+106% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Cape Verde |
| Release | July 2 2019 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #659 | #655 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













