Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250X

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R7 250X

2014Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

  • 36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 250X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 250X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 101% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
  • 25% longer card at 210mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 3200 better than Radeon R7 250X?
Yes. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2014, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is about 101.0% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 36.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (2,209 vs 2,269). Radeon R7 250X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R7 250X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R7 250X is 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 2,269 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low41 FPS22 FPS
medium27 FPS13 FPS
high20 FPS8 FPS
ultra11 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS10 FPS
medium17 FPS5 FPS
high10 FPS3 FPS
ultra5 FPS1 FPS
4K
low10 FPS4 FPS
medium7 FPS2 FPS
high4 FPS1 FPS
ultra3 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low78 FPS51 FPS
medium49 FPS27 FPS
high36 FPS19 FPS
ultra22 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low24 FPS23 FPS
medium17 FPS13 FPS
high12 FPS8 FPS
ultra9 FPS6 FPS
4K
low7 FPS7 FPS
medium5 FPS4 FPS
high4 FPS3 FPS
ultra3 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low99 FPS102 FPS
medium80 FPS82 FPS
high66 FPS68 FPS
ultra50 FPS51 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS77 FPS
medium60 FPS61 FPS
high50 FPS51 FPS
ultra37 FPS38 FPS
4K
low50 FPS51 FPS
medium40 FPS41 FPS
high33 FPS34 FPS
ultra25 FPS26 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low99 FPS102 FPS
medium80 FPS82 FPS
high66 FPS64 FPS
ultra50 FPS50 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS60 FPS
medium60 FPS47 FPS
high50 FPS38 FPS
ultra37 FPS28 FPS
4K
low50 FPS34 FPS
medium40 FPS25 FPS
high33 FPS20 FPS
ultra24 FPS14 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 250X

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score
2,209
2,269+3%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.385 TFLOPS+14%
1.216 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
TDP
65W-19%
80W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
210mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
70°C-15%
Perf/Watt
34.0+20%
28.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. The Radeon R7 250X costs 50.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 106.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon R7 250X
MSRP
$199
$99-50%
Performance per Dollar
11.1
22.9+106%
Codename
Polaris 23
Cape Verde
Release
July 2 2019
February 13 2014
Ranking
#659
#655