G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅79.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅79.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K3100M better than Radeon R7 250X?

Yes. Quadro K3100M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 79.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.6% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2013 instead of 2014, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3100M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro K3100M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro K3100M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 79.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 250X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon R7 250X make more sense than Quadro K3100M?

Yes. Radeon R7 250X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $99 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K3100M. The trade-off is that Quadro K3100M currently gives you 0.6% higher G3D Mark and 79.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon R7 250X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K3100M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low	78 FPS	22 FPS
medium	68 FPS	13 FPS
high	53 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	4 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	10 FPS
medium	61 FPS	5 FPS
high	43 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	4 FPS
medium	23 FPS	2 FPS
high	15 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	1 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Radeon R7 250X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low	68 FPS	51 FPS
medium	46 FPS	27 FPS
high	34 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	38 FPS	23 FPS
medium	21 FPS	13 FPS
high	16 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	14 FPS	7 FPS
medium	8 FPS	4 FPS
high	6 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	2 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Radeon R7 250X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low	103 FPS	102 FPS
medium	82 FPS	82 FPS
high	68 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	77 FPS
medium	62 FPS	61 FPS
high	51 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	38 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	51 FPS
medium	41 FPS	41 FPS
high	34 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	26 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Radeon R7 250X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
1080p
low	103 FPS	102 FPS
medium	82 FPS	82 FPS
high	68 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	60 FPS
medium	62 FPS	47 FPS
high	51 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	34 FPS
medium	41 FPS	25 FPS
high	33 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Radeon R7 250X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 250X

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3100M scores 2,283 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K3100M) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score	2,283	2,269
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+20%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.084 TFLOPS	1.216 TFLOPS+12%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	64 KB	160 KB+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X has 2 GB. The Quadro K3100M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K3100M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Quadro K3100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3100M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3100M) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon R7 250X
TDP	75W-6%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	30.4+7%	28.4