G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅69.4% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 609.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
175.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017

Why buy it

✅69.4% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,400 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 609.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
175.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,199 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 9100?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 69.4% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 12,250 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX 9100 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 157.8% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,400 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and you are getting 69.4% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 157.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 609.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX 9100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 9100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,199 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 9100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
1080p
low	188 FPS	169 FPS
medium	171 FPS	150 FPS
high	155 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	147 FPS
medium	125 FPS	125 FPS
high	111 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	70 FPS
medium	79 FPS	60 FPS
high	66 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 9100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
1080p
low	664 FPS	305 FPS
medium	539 FPS	268 FPS
high	415 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	206 FPS
medium	400 FPS	177 FPS
high	329 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	101 FPS
medium	211 FPS	85 FPS
high	187 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 9100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
1080p
low	921 FPS	551 FPS
medium	742 FPS	441 FPS
high	652 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	276 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	413 FPS
medium	578 FPS	331 FPS
high	497 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	207 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	276 FPS
medium	403 FPS	220 FPS
high	352 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	138 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 9100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
1080p
low	879 FPS	272 FPS
medium	731 FPS	237 FPS
high	664 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	207 FPS
medium	585 FPS	184 FPS
high	514 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	126 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	123 FPS
medium	408 FPS	108 FPS
high	366 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 9100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 9100

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro WX 9100

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 12,250 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 157.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
G3D Mark Score	31,578+158%	12,250
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	7680+88%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+226%	12.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+74%	1500 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240	256+7%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+650%	1 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	UVD 7.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 9100
TDP	285W	230W-19%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+108%	53.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 63.7% less ($1400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 605.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).