
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+65.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 813.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,250 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+65.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 813.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,250 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 9100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 9100

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 12,250 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 65.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+66% | 12,250 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+19% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+32% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+11% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+380% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 14% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-13% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+91% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 81.9% less ($1800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 808.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+809% | 5.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












