
Arc A580
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A580
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,020 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1109.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 230W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1128.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌31.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 175W.
Arc A580
2023Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,020 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1109.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 67.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 230W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1128.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 67.4 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌31.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 175W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 9100 better than Arc A580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A580 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 9100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A580 and Radeon Pro WX 9100

Arc A580
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.

Radeon Pro WX 9100
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A580 scores 12,060 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A580 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A580) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,060 | 12,250+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+33% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A580 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A580) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A580) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A580) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A580 draws 175W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 27.2% difference. The Arc A580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc A580) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 271mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-24% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 271mm | 267mm |
| Height | 132mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+29% | 53.3 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A580 launched at $179 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 launched at $2199. The Arc A580 costs 91.9% less ($2020 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 67.4 (Arc A580) vs 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) — the Arc A580 offers 1103.6% better value. The Arc A580 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc A580 | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-92% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.4+1104% | 5.6 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 10 2023 | July 10 2017 |
| Ranking | #223 | #219 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













