
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅45.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅45.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 8200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro WX 8200

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 12,615 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 37.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+38% | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+21% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+105% | 10.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+69% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 224+65% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-30% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+99% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | AD106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












