
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅47.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000
2019Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 153.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅47.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro WX 7130

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505+2% | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+17% | 1243 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+164% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The Quadro T1000 costs 60% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro T1000 offers 154.7% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3+155% | 6.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 27 2019 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #376 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












