Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅15.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 7130: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Why buy it

✅15.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P3200 Max-Q better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?

Yes. Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 1.5% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2016, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P3200 Max-Q is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7130 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 6,406 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	84 FPS	104 FPS
medium	72 FPS	88 FPS
high	61 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	73 FPS	90 FPS
medium	64 FPS	75 FPS
high	48 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	36 FPS
medium	25 FPS	32 FPS
high	17 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	17 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	210 FPS	182 FPS
medium	179 FPS	160 FPS
high	136 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	133 FPS
medium	134 FPS	111 FPS
high	107 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	74 FPS
medium	77 FPS	64 FPS
high	64 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	292 FPS	288 FPS
medium	234 FPS	231 FPS
high	195 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	216 FPS
medium	176 FPS	173 FPS
high	146 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	146 FPS	144 FPS
medium	117 FPS	115 FPS
high	98 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	72 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	166 FPS	248 FPS
medium	133 FPS	215 FPS
high	113 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	188 FPS
medium	96 FPS	165 FPS
high	82 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	104 FPS
medium	51 FPS	85 FPS
high	40 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	54 FPS

Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro WX 7130

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,500+1%	6,406
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.032 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1404 MHz+13%	1243 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112	144+29%
L1 Cache	672 KB+17%	576 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.