GRID P40-3Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 469.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,699 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 455.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P40-3Q better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,570 vs 6,406 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P40-3Q is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P40-3Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P40-3Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P40-3Q is about 469.9% more expensive on MSRP at $5,699 MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and you are getting 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7130 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon Pro WX 7130 make more sense than GRID P40-3Q?
Yes. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 225W), and staying closer to $1,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID P40-3Q. The trade-off is that GRID P40-3Q currently gives you 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7130 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low103 FPS104 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high70 FPS76 FPS
ultra42 FPS50 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS90 FPS
medium79 FPS75 FPS
high56 FPS57 FPS
ultra32 FPS37 FPS
4K
low29 FPS36 FPS
medium27 FPS32 FPS
high18 FPS21 FPS
ultra16 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low111 FPS182 FPS
medium78 FPS160 FPS
high57 FPS130 FPS
ultra39 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low72 FPS133 FPS
medium49 FPS111 FPS
high37 FPS90 FPS
ultra27 FPS71 FPS
4K
low36 FPS74 FPS
medium25 FPS64 FPS
high20 FPS52 FPS
ultra14 FPS39 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low296 FPS288 FPS
medium237 FPS231 FPS
high197 FPS192 FPS
ultra148 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low222 FPS216 FPS
medium177 FPS173 FPS
high148 FPS144 FPS
ultra111 FPS108 FPS
4K
low148 FPS144 FPS
medium118 FPS115 FPS
high99 FPS96 FPS
ultra74 FPS72 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low166 FPS248 FPS
medium133 FPS215 FPS
high117 FPS175 FPS
ultra90 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low121 FPS188 FPS
medium99 FPS165 FPS
high87 FPS129 FPS
ultra62 FPS107 FPS
4K
low70 FPS104 FPS
medium54 FPS85 FPS
high44 FPS67 FPS
ultra29 FPS54 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-3Q and Radeon Pro WX 7130

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score
6,570+3%
6,406
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536
2304+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS+150%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
144+13%
L1 Cache
128 KB
576 KB+350%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-3Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder
Tesla NVENC x24
VCE 3.4
Decoder
Tesla NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
TDP
225W
130W-42%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
29.2
49.3+69%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 82.5% less ($4699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 433.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP
$5699
$1000-82%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
6.4+433%
Codename
GK104
Ellesmere
Release
June 28 2013
November 10 2016
Ranking
#628
#331