
GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-3Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌469.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,699 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 455.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GRID P40-3Q
2013Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,699 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 455.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌469.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-3Q better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 7130 make more sense than GRID P40-3Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-3Q and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GRID P40-3Q
GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,570+3% | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 576 KB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-3Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Tesla NVENC x24 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Tesla NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 49.3+69% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 costs 82.5% less ($4699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 433.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $1000-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 6.4+433% |
| Codename | GK104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 28 2013 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #628 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












