GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
54.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
54.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,500 vs 6,406 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $649 MSRP. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is about $351 cheaper on MSRP at $649 MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer 2016 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (130W vs 250W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro WX 7130 make more sense than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 250W), and staying closer to $1,000 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 56.3%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	78 FPS	104 FPS
medium	67 FPS	88 FPS
high	54 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	90 FPS
medium	60 FPS	75 FPS
high	43 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	36 FPS
medium	24 FPS	32 FPS
high	16 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	181 FPS	182 FPS
medium	151 FPS	160 FPS
high	116 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	121 FPS	133 FPS
medium	89 FPS	111 FPS
high	67 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	74 FPS
medium	39 FPS	64 FPS
high	35 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	292 FPS	288 FPS
medium	234 FPS	231 FPS
high	195 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	216 FPS
medium	176 FPS	173 FPS
high	146 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	146 FPS	144 FPS
medium	117 FPS	115 FPS
high	98 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
1080p
low	180 FPS	248 FPS
medium	144 FPS	215 FPS
high	125 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	188 FPS
medium	102 FPS	165 FPS
high	90 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	104 FPS
medium	57 FPS	85 FPS
high	46 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon Pro WX 7130

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,500+1%	6,406
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock	902 MHz	1243 MHz+38%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+33%	144
L1 Cache	192 KB	576 KB+200%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP	250W	130W-48%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	26.0	49.3+90%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 costs 35.1% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 56.2% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).