
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 608% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $860 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 608% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 130W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 7130 better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1050 Ti make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+168% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+12% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 576 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+84% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 86% less ($860 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 609.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-86% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+609% | 6.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | October 25 2016 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #381 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













