
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS+6% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz+19% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 144+125% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+346% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+190% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GA107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 17 2021 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #349 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












