GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021Core: 1185 MHzBoost: 1477 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016

Why buy it

  • 24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Yes. GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro WX 7100 averages 24.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,717 vs 7,701 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7100 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 7,701 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
1080p
low84 FPS104 FPS
medium72 FPS88 FPS
high60 FPS76 FPS
ultra40 FPS50 FPS
1440p
low73 FPS90 FPS
medium63 FPS75 FPS
high47 FPS57 FPS
ultra30 FPS37 FPS
4K
low26 FPS36 FPS
medium25 FPS32 FPS
high17 FPS21 FPS
ultra14 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
1080p
low180 FPS182 FPS
medium153 FPS160 FPS
high128 FPS130 FPS
ultra101 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low131 FPS133 FPS
medium107 FPS111 FPS
high84 FPS90 FPS
ultra64 FPS71 FPS
4K
low75 FPS74 FPS
medium61 FPS64 FPS
high48 FPS52 FPS
ultra34 FPS39 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
1080p
low347 FPS347 FPS
medium278 FPS277 FPS
high232 FPS231 FPS
ultra174 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low260 FPS260 FPS
medium208 FPS208 FPS
high174 FPS173 FPS
ultra130 FPS130 FPS
4K
low167 FPS173 FPS
medium139 FPS139 FPS
high109 FPS116 FPS
ultra74 FPS87 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
1080p
low157 FPS248 FPS
medium129 FPS215 FPS
high107 FPS175 FPS
ultra93 FPS149 FPS
1440p
low114 FPS188 FPS
medium95 FPS165 FPS
high80 FPS129 FPS
ultra68 FPS107 FPS
4K
low66 FPS104 FPS
medium54 FPS85 FPS
high42 FPS67 FPS
ultra34 FPS54 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 7100

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7100

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
G3D Mark Score
7,717
7,701
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 4.0
Process Node
8 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.05 TFLOPS+6%
5.728 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1477 MHz+19%
1243 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
144+125%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+346%
0.56 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
TDP
45W-65%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
171.5+190%
59.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileRadeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP
$799
Codename
GA107
Ellesmere
Release
December 17 2021
November 10 2016
Ranking
#349
#331