
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
2017Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,853+2% | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2304+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+19% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 576 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-38% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.2+66% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GP106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | June 27 2017 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #401 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













