
FirePro W9100
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W9100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌111.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 130W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 275mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 397.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 275W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 275mm, a 34mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
FirePro W9100
2014Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 397.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 275W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 275mm, a 34mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌111.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 130W.
- ❌14.1% longer card at 275mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W9100 better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 7100 make more sense than FirePro W9100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9100 and Radeon Pro WX 7100

FirePro W9100
FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748 | 7,701 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+22% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+9% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+22% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+22% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 71.6% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 130W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | 80°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 59.2+110% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9100 launched at $4000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 costs 80% less ($3201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 405.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $799-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 9.6+405% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Ellesmere |
| Release | March 26 2014 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #328 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












