
Quadro P620
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌134.7% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.
Quadro P620
2018Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌134.7% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P620 better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

Quadro P620
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+20% | 1201 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+26% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Quadro P620 costs 57.4% less ($229 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Quadro P620 offers 137% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170-57% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.8+137% | 9.2 |
| Codename | GP107 | Baffin |
| Release | February 1 2018 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #524 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












