Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
25.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅24.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro K2200

2014

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅24.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
25.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than Quadro K2200?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 24.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.8% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2014, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is about $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 24.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.9%. Quadro K2200 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro K2200 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Yes. Quadro K2200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4100 currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark and 24.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K2200 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	26 FPS	41 FPS
medium	16 FPS	26 FPS
high	10 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	13 FPS	28 FPS
medium	7 FPS	17 FPS
high	3 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	4 FPS	10 FPS
medium	3 FPS	7 FPS
high	1 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	3 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	77 FPS	88 FPS
medium	48 FPS	57 FPS
high	36 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	36 FPS	42 FPS
medium	26 FPS	30 FPS
high	17 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	11 FPS
medium	9 FPS	9 FPS
high	8 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	5 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	161 FPS	166 FPS
medium	129 FPS	133 FPS
high	107 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	121 FPS	124 FPS
medium	97 FPS	99 FPS
high	81 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	64 FPS	66 FPS
high	54 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	41 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	151 FPS	148 FPS
medium	120 FPS	115 FPS
high	103 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	107 FPS
medium	91 FPS	85 FPS
high	78 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	61 FPS
medium	49 FPS	47 FPS
high	38 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	26 FPS

Open Quadro K2200 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200 scores 3,580 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,580	3,682+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	2.46 TFLOPS+71%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1201 MHz+7%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200 draws 68W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K2200	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	68W	50W-26%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	203mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	52.6	73.6+40%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 20.2% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Quadro K2200) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 27.8% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).