G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID T4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
111.8% HIGHER MSRP
$845 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $446 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GRID T4-2Q

2015

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Costs $446 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
✅Delivers 112.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
111.8% HIGHER MSRP
$845 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than GRID T4-2Q?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,668 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GRID T4-2Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is about $446 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $845 MSRP, and you are getting 0.4% higher G3D Mark. GRID T4-2Q is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GRID T4-2Q make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Yes. GRID T4-2Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $845 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4100 currently gives you 0.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 112.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID T4-2Q Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	103 FPS	52 FPS
medium	85 FPS	34 FPS
high	67 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	86 FPS	36 FPS
medium	72 FPS	22 FPS
high	51 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	11 FPS
medium	26 FPS	8 FPS
high	17 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	3 FPS

Open GRID T4-2Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	128 FPS	88 FPS
medium	101 FPS	57 FPS
high	82 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	42 FPS
medium	65 FPS	30 FPS
high	53 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	11 FPS
medium	32 FPS	9 FPS
high	29 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	5 FPS

Open GRID T4-2Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	165 FPS	166 FPS
medium	132 FPS	133 FPS
high	110 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	124 FPS
medium	99 FPS	99 FPS
high	83 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	83 FPS
medium	66 FPS	66 FPS
high	55 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	41 FPS

Open GRID T4-2Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	165 FPS	148 FPS
medium	132 FPS	115 FPS
high	110 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	107 FPS
medium	99 FPS	85 FPS
high	83 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	61 FPS
medium	60 FPS	47 FPS
high	49 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	26 FPS

Open GRID T4-2Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-2Q and Radeon Pro WX 4100

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-2Q scores 3,668 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,668	3,682
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+96%	2.46 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1201 MHz+2%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID T4-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID T4-2Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	16.3	73.6+352%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID T4-2Q launched at $845 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 52.8% less ($446 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 114% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).