GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID M60-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
526.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 524.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GRID M60-1Q

2015

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 524.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
526.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID M60-1Q better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,695 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID M60-1Q is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-1Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GRID M60-1Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID M60-1Q is about 526.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,500 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 0.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 4100 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Pro WX 4100 make more sense than GRID M60-1Q?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 225W), and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID M60-1Q. The trade-off is that GRID M60-1Q currently gives you 0.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 4100 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M60-1Q Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	103 FPS	52 FPS
medium	85 FPS	34 FPS
high	67 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	86 FPS	36 FPS
medium	72 FPS	22 FPS
high	51 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	11 FPS
medium	26 FPS	8 FPS
high	17 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	3 FPS

Open GRID M60-1Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	128 FPS	88 FPS
medium	101 FPS	57 FPS
high	82 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	42 FPS
medium	65 FPS	30 FPS
high	53 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	11 FPS
medium	32 FPS	9 FPS
high	29 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	5 FPS

Open GRID M60-1Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	166 FPS	166 FPS
medium	133 FPS	133 FPS
high	111 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	124 FPS
medium	100 FPS	99 FPS
high	83 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	83 FPS
medium	67 FPS	66 FPS
high	55 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	41 FPS

Open GRID M60-1Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	166 FPS	148 FPS
medium	133 FPS	115 FPS
high	111 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	107 FPS
medium	100 FPS	85 FPS
high	83 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	61 FPS
medium	60 FPS	47 FPS
high	49 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	26 FPS

Open GRID M60-1Q Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1Q and Radeon Pro WX 4100

GRID M60-1Q

The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-1Q scores 3,695 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,695	3,682
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+96%	2.46 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1201 MHz+2%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	16.4	73.6+349%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M60-1Q launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 84% less ($2101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 513.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).