G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI

2013

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than GeForce GTX 765M SLI?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon Pro WX 4100 averages 10.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,614 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 130W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 765M SLI is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 10.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce GTX 765M SLI is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 765M SLI make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Yes. GeForce GTX 765M SLI is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4100 currently gives you 1.9% higher G3D Mark and 10.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	37 FPS	41 FPS
medium	30 FPS	26 FPS
high	21 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	29 FPS	28 FPS
medium	21 FPS	17 FPS
high	13 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	10 FPS
medium	9 FPS	7 FPS
high	6 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 765M SLI Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	95 FPS	88 FPS
medium	66 FPS	57 FPS
high	47 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	52 FPS	42 FPS
medium	31 FPS	30 FPS
high	21 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	11 FPS
medium	11 FPS	9 FPS
high	9 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 765M SLI Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	163 FPS	166 FPS
medium	130 FPS	133 FPS
high	108 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	122 FPS	124 FPS
medium	98 FPS	99 FPS
high	81 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	65 FPS	66 FPS
high	54 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 765M SLI Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	118 FPS	148 FPS
medium	91 FPS	115 FPS
high	63 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	72 FPS	107 FPS
medium	52 FPS	85 FPS
high	39 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	61 FPS
medium	26 FPS	47 FPS
high	19 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 765M SLI Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon Pro WX 4100

GeForce GTX 765M SLI

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI scores 3,614 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,614	3,682+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.