
FirePro W7170M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W7170M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro W7170M
2015Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than FirePro W7170M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does FirePro W7170M make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Radeon Pro WX 4100

FirePro W7170M
FirePro W7170M
The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,605 | 3,682+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS+20% | 2.46 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 36.0 | 73.6+104% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro W7170M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Amethyst | Baffin |
| Release | October 2 2015 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #533 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












