FirePro W7170M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 4100 better than FirePro W7170M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,605 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 100W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W7170M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro WX 4100 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $399 MSRP. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. FirePro W7170M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does FirePro W7170M make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Yes. FirePro W7170M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 4100. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 4100 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low104 FPS41 FPS
medium89 FPS26 FPS
high73 FPS20 FPS
ultra43 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS28 FPS
medium80 FPS17 FPS
high58 FPS10 FPS
ultra33 FPS5 FPS
4K
low29 FPS10 FPS
medium27 FPS7 FPS
high18 FPS4 FPS
ultra16 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low96 FPS88 FPS
medium74 FPS57 FPS
high60 FPS43 FPS
ultra44 FPS24 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS42 FPS
medium40 FPS30 FPS
high31 FPS22 FPS
ultra23 FPS15 FPS
4K
low24 FPS11 FPS
medium17 FPS9 FPS
high13 FPS8 FPS
ultra10 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low162 FPS166 FPS
medium130 FPS133 FPS
high108 FPS110 FPS
ultra81 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS124 FPS
medium97 FPS99 FPS
high81 FPS83 FPS
ultra61 FPS62 FPS
4K
low81 FPS83 FPS
medium65 FPS66 FPS
high54 FPS55 FPS
ultra41 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low162 FPS148 FPS
medium130 FPS115 FPS
high108 FPS94 FPS
ultra81 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low122 FPS107 FPS
medium97 FPS85 FPS
high81 FPS70 FPS
ultra61 FPS56 FPS
4K
low75 FPS61 FPS
medium58 FPS47 FPS
high47 FPS36 FPS
ultra31 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7170M and Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score
3,605
3,682+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS+20%
2.46 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7170M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
36.0
73.6+104%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP
$399
Codename
Amethyst
Baffin
Release
October 2 2015
November 10 2016
Ranking
#533
#526