FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 501.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,399 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 487.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro S7150 better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,770 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro S7150 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7150 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro S7150 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro S7150 is about 501.3% more expensive on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 4100 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Pro WX 4100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,682 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low104 FPS52 FPS
medium89 FPS34 FPS
high73 FPS25 FPS
ultra43 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS36 FPS
medium80 FPS22 FPS
high58 FPS12 FPS
ultra33 FPS6 FPS
4K
low29 FPS11 FPS
medium27 FPS8 FPS
high18 FPS5 FPS
ultra16 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low143 FPS88 FPS
medium115 FPS57 FPS
high93 FPS43 FPS
ultra68 FPS24 FPS
1440p
low84 FPS42 FPS
medium61 FPS30 FPS
high47 FPS22 FPS
ultra35 FPS15 FPS
4K
low34 FPS11 FPS
medium24 FPS9 FPS
high19 FPS8 FPS
ultra14 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low170 FPS166 FPS
medium136 FPS133 FPS
high113 FPS110 FPS
ultra85 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS124 FPS
medium102 FPS99 FPS
high85 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS62 FPS
4K
low85 FPS83 FPS
medium68 FPS66 FPS
high57 FPS55 FPS
ultra42 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low170 FPS148 FPS
medium136 FPS115 FPS
high113 FPS94 FPS
ultra85 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS107 FPS
medium102 FPS85 FPS
high85 FPS70 FPS
ultra64 FPS56 FPS
4K
low76 FPS61 FPS
medium58 FPS47 FPS
high47 FPS36 FPS
ultra31 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score
3,770+2%
3,682
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+53%
2.46 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1
73.6+193%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 83.4% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 475% better value.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP
$2399
$399-83%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
9.2+475%
Codename
Tonga
Baffin
Release
February 1 2016
November 10 2016
Ranking
#521
#526