
FirePro S7150
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S7150
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌501.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 487.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro S7150
2016Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 487.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌501.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S7150 better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770+2% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.768 TFLOPS+53% | 2.46 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 73.6+193% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 costs 83.4% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 475% better value.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $399-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 9.2+475% |
| Codename | Tonga | Baffin |
| Release | February 1 2016 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #521 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












