G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 95W instead of 295W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅172.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌210.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 95W.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

2025

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 95W instead of 295W, a 200W reduction.

Why buy it

✅172.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌210.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7900 averages 172.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 28,280 vs 28,211 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a 2025 card with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, while Radeon PRO W7900 is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023, better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $3,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7900 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7900 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon PRO W7900 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $3,999 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	149 FPS	262 FPS
medium	133 FPS	242 FPS
high	107 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	136 FPS	246 FPS
medium	115 FPS	205 FPS
high	81 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	174 FPS
medium	53 FPS	145 FPS
high	35 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	167 FPS	813 FPS
medium	125 FPS	639 FPS
high	86 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	617 FPS
medium	71 FPS	495 FPS
high	51 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	320 FPS
medium	37 FPS	256 FPS
high	30 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	670 FPS	945 FPS
medium	533 FPS	775 FPS
high	458 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	398 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	714 FPS
medium	390 FPS	587 FPS
high	330 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	276 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	307 FPS	498 FPS
medium	250 FPS	412 FPS
high	191 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	141 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	214 FPS	946 FPS
medium	183 FPS	801 FPS
high	148 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	170 FPS	714 FPS
medium	147 FPS	604 FPS
high	114 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	505 FPS
medium	73 FPS	437 FPS
high	59 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 28,280 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1515 MHz vs 2495 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	28,280	28,211
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10496+71%	6144
Boost Clock	1515 MHz	2495 MHz+65%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	24 GB	48 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	896 GB/s+4%	864 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	NVENC (Blackwell)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Blackwell)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile draws 95W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 102.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	95W-68%	295W
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	3
Temp (Load)	85	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	297.7+211%	95.6