GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 1967 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 3060

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • +28.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $3,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1271.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

  • 8.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,182 vs 16,995).
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 963.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,499 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 28.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 28.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about $3,170 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $3,499 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 28.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1271.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $3,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low149 FPS173 FPS
medium131 FPS154 FPS
high118 FPS134 FPS
ultra99 FPS114 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS144 FPS
medium104 FPS117 FPS
high92 FPS102 FPS
ultra80 FPS93 FPS
4K
low67 FPS91 FPS
medium58 FPS77 FPS
high39 FPS61 FPS
ultra32 FPS54 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low354 FPS579 FPS
medium310 FPS475 FPS
high249 FPS390 FPS
ultra195 FPS297 FPS
1440p
low222 FPS397 FPS
medium196 FPS326 FPS
high160 FPS263 FPS
ultra128 FPS218 FPS
4K
low110 FPS159 FPS
medium94 FPS137 FPS
high77 FPS117 FPS
ultra60 FPS94 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low765 FPS593 FPS
medium612 FPS475 FPS
high510 FPS395 FPS
ultra382 FPS297 FPS
1440p
low535 FPS445 FPS
medium432 FPS356 FPS
high366 FPS297 FPS
ultra287 FPS222 FPS
4K
low367 FPS297 FPS
medium298 FPS237 FPS
high221 FPS198 FPS
ultra176 FPS148 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
1080p
low523 FPS593 FPS
medium452 FPS475 FPS
high383 FPS395 FPS
ultra319 FPS297 FPS
1440p
low428 FPS445 FPS
medium371 FPS356 FPS
high298 FPS297 FPS
ultra245 FPS222 FPS
4K
low279 FPS297 FPS
medium259 FPS237 FPS
high225 FPS198 FPS
ultra186 FPS148 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 28.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 112 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score
16,995+29%
13,182
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
3584
3840 ×2+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS ×2+19%
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
1967 MHz+11%
ROPs
48
96 ×2+100%
TMUs
112
240 ×2+114%
L1 Cache
3.5 MB+367%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
Ray Tracing Cores
28
60 ×2+114%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
360 GB/s
864 GB/s+140%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 80.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP
170W-57%
400W
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
280mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
100.0+203%
33.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 90.6% less ($3170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1260.5% better value.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP
$329-91%
$3499
Performance per Dollar
51.7+1261%
3.8
Codename
GA106
Navi 21
Release
January 12 2021
August 3 2021
Ranking
#114
#157