G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 95W instead of 260W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅149.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌173.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 95W.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

2025

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 95W instead of 260W, a 165W reduction.

Why buy it

✅149.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌173.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7800 averages 149.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 28,280 vs 27,180 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a 2025 card with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, while Radeon PRO W7800 is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023, better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7800 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7800 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7800 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $2,499 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	149 FPS	225 FPS
medium	133 FPS	210 FPS
high	107 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	136 FPS	203 FPS
medium	115 FPS	171 FPS
high	81 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	138 FPS
medium	53 FPS	115 FPS
high	35 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	167 FPS	619 FPS
medium	125 FPS	508 FPS
high	86 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	329 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	450 FPS
medium	71 FPS	371 FPS
high	51 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	246 FPS
medium	37 FPS	206 FPS
high	30 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	151 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	670 FPS	918 FPS
medium	533 FPS	762 FPS
high	458 FPS	676 FPS
ultra	398 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	709 FPS
medium	390 FPS	583 FPS
high	330 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	276 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	307 FPS	497 FPS
medium	250 FPS	411 FPS
high	191 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	141 FPS	291 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	214 FPS	881 FPS
medium	183 FPS	732 FPS
high	148 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	583 FPS
1440p
low	170 FPS	692 FPS
medium	147 FPS	577 FPS
high	114 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	445 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	472 FPS
medium	73 FPS	405 FPS
high	59 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	306 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 28,280 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1515 MHz vs 2525 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score	28,280+4%	27,180
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10496+134%	4480
Boost Clock	1515 MHz	2525 MHz+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 896 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity	24 GB	32 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	896 GB/s+56%	576 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder	NVENC (Blackwell)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Blackwell)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile draws 95W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 93% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7800
TDP	95W-63%	260W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	297.7+185%	104.5