
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅27.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅27.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU make more sense than Radeon PRO W7800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 56.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400 | 27,180+56% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4480+3% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2525 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 136 | 280+106% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+115% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 70+106% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 576 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-38% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+4% | 104.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












